I haven’t been closely monitoring the performance of PCjs across various browsers. Most of my browser testing has been limited to “Does the latest version still work in all current web browsers?”

However, at some point during the last couple months, Chrome’s performance suddenly jumped through the roof. On my 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 MacBook Pro, Chrome v34.0.1847.131 easily punches through the 120Mhz barrier on a PCjs machine running PC-DOS 2.00.

That’s roughly a 3x-4x increase over previous versions of Chrome. Safari used to be the performance champ, capable of running a PCjs machine at a top speed of around 70-80MHz, while Chrome was less than half that, and Firefox was slower still.

Chrome has now leap-frogged Safari in a big way, almost doubling Safari’s speed. And with Chrome’s superior Developer Tools, Chrome is clearly the “Browser of Choice,” whether you’re just playing with PCjs or actually debugging it.

Firefox is a bit of a disappointment, given all the hoopla over asm.js and other investments that Mozilla is making. I’ve taken a “wait-and-see” attitude toward asm.js, because PCjs is hand-coded JavaScript, and I’m not prepared to build a preprocessor that converts the code to asm.js semantics solely for the benefit of a single browser.

Chrome’s approach to making regular JavaScript run faster seems to be a winning strategy so far, at least for apps like PCjs.

@jeffpar
May 12, 2014